Tuesday, May 15, 2007

A Sad Day in SW Michigan & Everywhere in the U.S.A.


Huseyin Parlak, a Turkish national who fears for his life in Turkey, was deported by trickery yesterday. His case doesn't enjoy the notoriety of his brother Ibrahim's case, but is connected to it by blood and legal theory. For anyone who knows the Parlak brothers, this is truly a sad development. For anyone who doesn't, read on. My guess is that you'll be a bit annoyed by the end of this entry.

Ibrahim Parlak and Huseyin Parlak are Kurdish, which is to say they are members of an ethnic minority in Turkey that has long been persecuted and mistreated by the government of Turkey. Ibrahim Parlak successfully applied for asylum in the U.S. in the early 1990s, and converted it to lawful permanent residence. His problems began when he applied for U.S. citizenship five years later. The government decided that he had lied on his naturalization application by not checking the box asking if he had ever been arrested.

His only arrest was by Turkish forces who arrested, beat and tortured him for months at a time for his outspoken views on Kurdish independence. He was convicted of "separatist activities" by a Turkish Security Court, which has since been disbanded because it used torture and other inhumane techniques to extract confessions.

Ibrahim knew that the U.S. government was aware of those "arrests", because they were precisely why he was given asylum. He and his lawyer at that time did not believe it was necessary to check yes when it was clear the government knew of those detentions. He had never had any real criminal problems anywhere, at any time.

After Ibrahim's naturalization case was denied, they put him in removal proceedings for the unchecked box. Ibrahim did what any one of us with a small child and life in the United States would do. He fought back. Ibrahim and his supporters dug their heals in, and got organized, American style. They formed committees, they told his story, and told it well.

The U.S. government wasn't pleased with Ibrahim's competence in getting his message out. Senators and other Congressional members became irritated that our country was doing this to a man who had seemingly done nothing wrong. He is a pillar of his community. He is a family man.

The government became so annoyed, they decided to up the ante and retaliate against Ibrahim. While I don't profess to know what they were actually thinking, the circumstantial evidence in their actions is enough for me to comfortably label it as retaliation. The government alleged that Ibrahim's activities as a Kurdish rights activist constituted acts of terrorism under the new definitions provided by the Patriot Act. This included an alleged affiliation with an organization that he was allegedly sympathetic to in Turkey 15 years prior to it being characterized as a terrorist organization. In other words, the government applied the Patriot Act retroactively to his same activities that had once garnered him asylum and permanent residency. Even a federal judge eventually agreed that what they were doing was "piling on". A federal judge ordered Ibrahim to be released from custody while his case was appealed. It remains on appeal.

Enter Huseyin, his soft-spoken brother who kept the restaurant open while Ibrahim was being held in a maximum security federal penitentiary in Battle Creek for nearly a year. Huseyin came to the United States as a student, attended school and was prepared to return to Turkey. He changed his mind when the the U.S. government broke out the terrorist label. He knew returning to Turkey would now be a problem for his safety.

Like his brother Huseyin has never been arrested or convicted for any crime, and has not been accused of any nefarious activities anywhere, at any time. The government caught up to Huseyin and put him in deportation proceedings as well, perhaps figuring they could demoralize Ibrahim by taking a run at his family (again, circumstantially, there is no other explanation) Oh, and while the government was at it, they tried to shut down the brothers' enormously popular restaurant, Cafe Gulistan. They tried to revoke his liquor license because he again did not list his arrest and torture from Turkey on his liquor license application.

I am not making this up.

He hired lawyers and once again beat the government back from taking away his livelihood.

Huseyin's bid for asylum was denied by an immigration judge who (1) didn't believe his story of past persecution because of minor differences between his written application and his testimony, and (2) because the IJ viewed the country conditions in Turkey as vastly improved and downright balmy. The problem with this view is that it is fiction. The U.S. State Department's own country condition report on human rights belies the immigration judge's conclusions that all is well in Turkey. It is still crucible of persecution for Kurds and especially Kurd activists, and is a very dangerous place indeed if you are of that ethnicity.

Huseyin appealed the Immigration Judge's decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals. It is the administrative appeals unit for the immigration court system, and is severely over-taxed by too many cases and too few judges. Meaningful reviews are hard to come by in this forum, but one has to exhaust his appeals there before proceeding to the federal courts, where resources flow freely, as does intellect and thoroughness. Very bright people have come to see that the administrative forum for removal and asylum cases is completely inadequate. This includes Judge Posner from the Seventh Circuit, as well as other circuit court judges.

The Board upheld the immigration court's denial of his claim, without discussing those problematic country condition reports at all. That's a problem according to all of the precedent decisions in the federal courts. Huseyin and his lawyer (me) appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals where he will point out these significant shortcomings when the briefing schedule is issued. In the meantime though, Congress, in its infinite wisdom, decided that the government ought to be able to remove foreign nationals while their first appeal to the federal courts is pending. The idea of that being fair and American is quite a stretch, but it is what the law currently provides.

We filed a Motion to Stay his removal, which is a very difficult remedy to gain. This is because courts don't like to step on Congress's will unless the situation is extreme. We argued that Huseyin's case presented those extremes, but the Sixth Circuit denied the motion. It should be said that very few of these motions are granted, and many appellate courts that eventually sustain appeals first deny motions for a stay. Most foreign nationals in that situation are issued orders of supervision and are permitted to stay pending their appeal. Huseyin was treated a bit differently, because he is the brother of a person who has made the government look bad by publicizing their over-zealous action.

I attended his first check in appointment with the Detroit office of ICE with him and met with his deportation officer. The officer explained that because he has a valid appeal pending, and because he was not a flight risk or a danger to others, he would be permitted to stay in the United States, without detention, on a OS ("order of supervision"). That order was given to me on April 10, 2007. It required that Huseyin return to Detroit on May 14, 2007 to check in. This is all very standard in a case like this. Except that the officer lied to us.

Our motion for a stay was denied on Friday, May 11, 2007. This came as no surprise, and did not cause us alarm, because Huseyin had been given an order of supervision. Furthermore, the fact that the motion was pending does not stop the government from executing an removal order. The Sixth Circuit's opinion was very brief, and did not arrive by mail until Monday, May 14 at about 2:00 p.m. Huseyin was on a plane at the time I opened the decision.

Huseyin was detained, cuffed and whisked - triple time - away yesterday when he reported at his check in appointment. The government usually takes at least several days to actually deport someone in custody once the decide to take that step. Sometimes it takes weeks or even months. Not this time. They had him on a plane within an hour or two.

The most disturbing part of this case is that the merits of his case - the objective country conditions in Turkey with respect to vocal Kurds, or those perceived as taking part in Kurdish activism - has yet to be addressed in his case. The immigration judge didn't discuss that evidence. The Board of Immigration didn't bother explaining why it wasn't important, or why it didn't apply to Huseyin; nor could it in its one page opinion. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is the first forum that will discuss that evidence. Now, it could be too late.

This isn't sour grapes, or one man's thoughts. The government's overreaching not only in this case, but in many others, is becoming frightening. It would be downright disingenuous to even suggest that Huseyin would have been lied to, arrested and deported so quickly if he wasn't Ibrahim's brother. The government can say what it wants about following the law and its own procedures, but the way they handled this stinks.

His family is devastated, and worried, and most of all disappointed. They thought the government of the United States stood for justice, and stood for what is right. They thought the government's agents could be trusted. They were wrong.

Governments are made of people, and people are fallible. Systems break down. It's not as easy as good vs. evil, competent vs. incompetent. It's history's oldest lesson: Too much power mixed with the wrong messages from leadership creates an inevitably poison cocktail.

Drink at your own risk, or contact your Senator or Congressional Rep to express your discontent. Or do nothing at all and hope U.S citizens who express their opinions aren't treated with the same disregard for due process.

4 comments:

Liam said...

Enraged and horrified doesn't even begin to describe how I feel about how our country has mistreated the brothers Parlak. Here's a letter I'll be sending to every relevant publication that I can think of:

"If we can't get you, then we'll go after your family."

That is neither a threat from an organized crime organization nor an excerpt from the latest pro-terrorist message released by Al Qaida. That chilling phrase has become the official policy of the United States Government.

Having been thwarted in its attempts to defame and deport southwest Michigan resident Ibrahim Parlak, the Department of Homeland Security has been setting its sights on Mr. Parlak's brother, Huseyin Parlak. DHS has been using the same methods against Mr. Huseyin Parlak as were employed against his brother: fraudulent allegations, overblown rhetoric and trumped-up charges.

It is a triumph of justice that such despicable methods have yet to railroad Ibrahim Parlak. It is a tragic miscarriage of justice that on May 14, 2007, Huseyin Parlak was suddenly thrown out of the United States. Thinking that he was attending a routine meeting with DHS, Huseyin was seized without warning and shoved onto a plane bound for Istanbul, Turkey. He was not even given the chance to pack his belongings, settle his affairs or say good-bye to his family and friends.

Huseyin Parlak is not a terrorist. He was a model resident of this country who desired with all his heart to become a model citizen of this country, but because his brother Ibrahim was a political inconvenience to our government, Huseyin became a target and then a victim.

As I write this in the comfort of my home, I cannot help but reflect that my personal politics also make me a political inconvenience to our government. As you read this in the comfort of your home, are you asking yourself if you've ever done anything that makes you a political inconvenience? Will you ever be victimized by the same sort of summary punitive action that was sprung upon Huseyin Parlak?

If you're chuckling and dismissing me as an overly paranoid hack, then for your sake and mine, I sincerely hope that you are right. It would be an enormous relief if the histories of post-Weimar Germany and Stalinist Russia did not reoccur in 21st Century America. If you choose to remain silent and be complicit while American law enforcement degenerates into thuggery, then I sincerely hope that you are never singled out for political persecution like the Parlak brothers have been.

Because if you are, then they will get you. And if they can't get you, then they'll go after your family.

John Young said...

5/16/07

It is distressing to find that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is continuing to promote terrorism by relentlessly creating mistrust of both its motives & competence, domestically as well as globally. The latest retribution against the Parlak family is another in a tragically long list of gratuitous cruelty to innumerable families. Huseyin Parlak was taken into custody at what was understood to be a routine hearing in Detroit Monday, 14 May 2007, & deported without any notice or opportunity to bring his belongings or get his affairs in order, whereas 72 hours is customarily provided.

Why must my tax money continue to be misspent to make my family & my country less secure & more at risk? Why would a US citizen & patriot not conclude that DHS is not just an unsupervised bureaucracy which has run wildly & dangerously amok, but has also become so intent on vindictively punishing anyone who challenges it & exposes its incompetence, that it actively weakens US security and puts the country it nominally works for, at much greater risk.

Patriotic taxpayers should pledge not to voluntarily cooperate with federal authorities until this situation is conclusively corrected, & to oppose current US “security” policies in every lawful manner until they are reformed to actually create greater security, instead of promoting terrorism on one hand while trying to scare US citizens/voters into unquestioning submission. That ruthless trick has become too tired and too often exposed to work any longer. Once demands for blind trust are discovered to have been dishonest, trust cannot be restored without a complete change in policy, practice and personnel.

After all, in a democracy, public servants are paid to serve the public, not their own selfish interests.

John Young

Randy said...

Thanks for your efforts my friends. I've watched, read, listened, and written a handful of letters to Congress as well as sharing this continuing story.

I admire the efforts that many of you have put into the case for justice of this family.

I'll write more letters, and thanks for simply being deeply good people.

Randy Buist
Hudsonville, Michigan

kay said...

Huseyin Parlak was a friend, a devoted brother and loving uncle, as well as a shining example of the "good immigrant." His deportation has created a void, and ripped an irreplaceable tear in the fabric of our community.

I apologize for my country's handling of his case and can only hope that we the voters will change our government's policies towards immigrants by changing our government in 2008.